Det fremgik af Metro Express af 10 okt og flere andre medier , at det er blevet forbudt at handle med e-cigaretter i Danmark,
dette er ikke rigtigt !!
klik her for MetroExpress artikkel
Se dette link *og læs at forbudet for forhandling af E-Cigaretter er suspenderet for ét firma i Danmark
og kun for ét firma : NyCigaret, så vi altså det eneste firma der lovligt kan markedsføre og sælge elektroniske cigaretter i Danmark !
(*Scroll ned af listen og se at der er en * ud for Idé Fabrikken , den betyder at ministeriet har givet vores klage opsættende virkning se dette i tredje afsnit fra oven på linket )
Skulle der senere komme et forbud ? så husk at det kun er de nikotin refiller vi kan blive tvunget til at sende dig fra et andet EU land , E-Cigaretterne og opladerne samt refillerne med 0 mg nikotin vil vi altid kunne levere herfra Birkerød !
Mail os meget gerne dine oplevelser med NyCigaret, og vi lægger dit indlæg ind på siden "kunderne skrev" se siden her
Hør klip fra P3 Nyhederne 10 oktober med Mikael Rosanes for NyCigaret klik her
Ekstra Bladet 11-10-08
|
| En EU-konference imod rygning, som har påvirket bl.a. den danske rygelov, var finansieret af medicinalgiganter med økonomiske interesser i salg af rygestop-produkter, påpeger en fransk professor, som har fundet flere graverende fejl i en rapport fra konferencen. |
| Af Ole Birk Olesen |
|
Flere kritiske videnskabelige røster rejser sig imod rygeforbudene - ikke kun i USA, men nu også i Europa. Seneste eksempel er den kendte franske tobaksspecialist, professor i medicin Robert Molimard fra Det medicinske faktultet i Paris, som offentligt anklager forfatterne bag den officielle EU-rapport om passiv røg for manipulation. Samtidig beskylder professoren EU for at være i lommen på medicinalindustrien i et korstog mod tobakken.
Professor Molimard mener, at EU-Kommissionen har presset de nationale regeringer til at indføre rygeforbud i Europa på et tyndt videnskabeligt grundlag. Dette skete ifølge professoren samtidig med, at politikere og embedsværk i EU sad på skødet af medicinal-giganterne GlaxoSmithKline og Pfizer, som har finansieret EU's officielle rapport om passiv røg og en stor EU-antitobakskonference i 2005. Medicinal-virksomhederne har efterfølgende opnået økonomisk gevinst ved indførslen af rygeforbudene p.g.a. de tobaks-afhængige rygeres efterfølgende behov for røgfrie nikotin-produkter og rygestop-produkter.
Den officielle EU-rapport "Lifting the smokescreen: 10 reasons for a smokefree Europe" er slutresultatet af den store "Smoke Free Europe Conference", der blev afholdt af EU i Luxembourg i 2005, sponsoreret af GlaxoSmithKline og Pfizer, som i dag er i markedet med rygestop-produkterne Zyban, Nicorette og Champix.
EU-rapportens tal og konklusioner var ifølge Molimard medvirkende årsag til, at de franske politikere indførte rygeforbud i Frankrig i 2007. Det samme var tilfældet i Danmark, hvor Kræftens Bekæmpelse slog på tromme for rapporten.
I en kritisk videnskabelig analyse, som netop er lagt på internettet på engelsk under titlen "The EU-report: Lifting the smokescreen - Epidemiological study or manipulation?", anklager Robert Molimard EU-rapporten for "at trampe på de mest elementære videnskabelige principper". Han kritiserer den bl.a. for udelukkende at hvile på ensidige spørgeundersøgelser og for at have beregnet et alt for højt esitimeret tal for passiv røg-dødsfald i Frankrig, nemlig 6.000 franskmænd årligt.
Professor Molimard påviser i sin analyse, at 75% af de 6.000, der ifølge rapporten ville dø af passiv røg, i virkeligheden er storrygere, mens knap 25% af rapportens estimerede dødsfald er ex-rygere, som heller ikke dør af passiv røg, men derimod af deres tidligere aktive rygning. Tilbage er ifølge Molimard et tal på ca. 30 personer, som ifølge rapportens metode kan risikere at dø af passiv røg på de franske arbejdspladser, heraf 2 dødsfald årligt blandt personalet i hele den franske serveringsbranche.
"Og hvor stor er så brøkdelen af risiko for bar- og tabac-personalet, som retfærdiggør den 'overkill'-lovgivning, der har ramt dem? Selv hvis man tager rapportens metode for gode varer, ligger antallet langt under, hvad der normalt betragtes som et seriøst sundhedsproblem, der kræver så repressive forbud, skriver Robert Molimard og fortsætter:
"Antallet af dødsfald er så lavt, at man må undre sig over, hvad det virkelige formål med rapporten er, og hvilke interessekonflikter, der gemmer sig bag den. Det er også rimeligt at stille spørgsmålstegn ved de sande motiver for rygeforbudene."
Herefter problematiserer professoren finansieringskilden for EU's antiryge-politik.
"Var EU f.eks. ikke selv i stand til at finansiere en debat om sådan et vigtigt emne? Det er skandaløst, at en stor ministeriel EU-konference, organiseret af rapportens forfattere, blev sponsoreret af to medicinal-giganter som Glaxo og Pfizer, der sælger rygestop produkter, som rygerne kan få tilskud til - samtidig med at branchen må annoncere dem og sælge dem i håndkøb. Deres lobby-grupper er sandelig effektive! Denne rapport kaster et meget tvivlsomt lys over den sag, rapporten hævder at forsvare," skriver Robert Molimard:
"Den enorme mængde penge, der er på spil i denne sag, kræver, at den bliver behandlet uden indblanding fra lobbygrupper - ikke bare fra tobaksindustrien, men også fra medicinalindustrien."
|
|
|
Presse & internet klip
E-Cigaretter
Nedenstående er klippet fra diverse aviser samt søgninger på Google,
og altså ikke noget der er skrevet af NyCigaret.dk
|
|
NyCigaret har også en sag med Lægemiddelstyrelsen , som har skrevet til os at fordi nogle af vore refiller til vor NyCigaret
indeholder nikotin , er det ifl.
deres opfattelse et læge middel .
Dertil har vi svaret , at det da ikke kan være eneafgørende for et produkt , hvis et produkt indeholder nikotin bliver det automatisk kategoriseret som et lægemiddel, i så fald må almindelige cigaretter, kartofler tomater og auberginer også være lægemidler da de ligeledes indeholder nikotin, i forskellige mængder.
Ligeledes argumenter lægemiddelstyrelsen at hvis et produkt har en farmakologisk virkning på kroppen er det også et lægemiddel , dette tilbageviser vi, da der findes masser af nydelses midler som har en farmakologisk virkning som ikke er kategoristeret som lægemidler, alkohol og mange andre nydelsesmidler.
Derfor mener vi at vi får medhold i vor klage og vi fortsætter salget , da vi på intet tidspunkt har markedført NyCigaret som et lægemiddel, men som et nydelsesmiddel som et alternativ til almindelig rygning .
|
|
Læs hvad rygestop konsulenten skrev om indholdet af E-cigaretter
her
Spørgsmål: Elektronisk cigaret
Hej Kai
Jeg har købt en elektronisk cigaret for i første omgang at nedsætte mit cigaretforbrug.
Jeg vil gerne vide, hvad det er jeg indhalerer i den elektroniske cigaret! Og ja, det ved jeg jo dybest set heller ikke, når jeg ryger cigaretter! :-) Det er lidt svært at finde ud af, hvad der er i de ampuller, man køber til den elektroniske cigaret (herefter forkortet EC), men jeg har fundet ud af, at der er: water, propylene glycol, nicotine, a scent that emulates a tobacco flavour. Kan I sige noget om faren ved propylenglycol. Der er meget modsatrettede oplysninger på nettet. Det bliver åbenbart brugt i alt fra shampoo til kraftfoder. Nogle steder bliver det kaldt en nervegas med leverskader og alt muligt andet væmmeligt og andre steder igen, bliver det kaldt stort set uskadeligt!
Hvad er jeres mening om stoffet...?
Så er der selvfølgelig lige den der "scent" der emulerer tobakssmagen, den har jeg ikke kunne finde ud af hvad er! For at imødegå advarsler om at både ryge og intage nikotin samtidig, så skal jeg måske lige nævne at jeg vil bruge de ampuller der findes uden nikotin! Håber I kan hjælpe!
Hilsen Jens
Svar fra: Kai Bylling
Kære Jens
Tak for dit spørgsmål.
Umiddelbart vil jeg ikke være bekymret for indholdet af propylenglykol i den elektroniske cigaret.. Sammenlignet med de ca 4000 forskellige stoffer der optræder i tobaksrøgen, forekommer det relativt uskyldigt.
Den eneste tvivl jeg kunne have, drejer sig om temperaturen i den elektroniske cigaret. Det har ikke været muligt for mig at få oplysning om temperaturen under fordampningen, så jeg aner ikke, hvad der sker med propylenglycol og de nævnte aromastoffer.
Er der tale om en ufuldstændig forbrænding, som i glødezonen på en cigaret, vil propylenglykol og aromastofferne sandsynligvis blive nedbrudt og resultatet ligger udenfor min viden. Er der blot tale om en fordampning (propylenglykol koger ved 188,2 o C ), vil dampen indeholde de stoffer, der fremgår af deklarationen.
Propylenglykols egenskaber er velkendt og velbeskrevet i litteraturen og stoffet er i vid udstrækning uskadeligt, når det kommer ind i kroppen i kontrollerede mængder. Man kan sige at: "Alt er giftigt, det er blot et spørgsmål om mængden."
I fødevareindustrien anvendes det som opløsningsmiddel for tilsætningsstofer og aromastofer i mængder, svarende til 1 gram pr. kilo fødevarer.
Lægemiddelindustrien har i mange år brugt det som hjælpestof i bl.a. injektionsvæsker.
I kroppen omsættes det til eddikesyre og pyrodruesyre. Begge stoffer er velkendte og pyrodruesyren indgår naturligt i kroppens energistofskifte.
Held og lykke med dit rygestop-projekt.
Venlig hilsen
Kai Bylling
Farmaceut og rygestopinstruktør.
|
| Interresant læsning om Propylen Glycol Læs et indlæg fra New Zealand, hvor der argumenteres for at inhalering af Propylen Glykol (PG)
E-CIGARETTE USE - COULD IT PROTECT US ALL FROM THE NEXT PANDEMIC?
Murray Laugesen
Public health physician www.healthnz.co.nz
Bob Bowden, Florida contributor to e-cigarette-forum.com, raises the question whether e-cigarettes, apart from avoiding smoking and future lung cancer risk, actually confers immediate short term positive benefits, by reducing the risk of its users inhaling live viruses and bacteria from room air. This is mind-blowing enough, but could its possible benefits also protect others close by? Is the e-cigarette more than a tool for reducing harm? Is it also potentially a talisman to ward off infection?
History
That propylene glycol (PG) may protect users of the e-cigarette from airborne bacterial and viruses dates back to World War II. 'Air Germicide', a story in Time magazine Nov 16, 1942, reported the research of Dr. Oswald Hope Robertson at Chicago's BillingsHospital. He showed that half a part per million of PG in air could kill bacteria and viruses in that air within seconds. He found PG could protect mice from influenza virus, and that monkeys could well tolerate living in air containing PG. On the face of it, e-cigarette users might indeed be better off.
Second hand PG
For e-cigarette mist to have any chance of protecting non-users of e-cigarettes depends on whether e-cigarette users exhale sufficient PG, and this is doubtful. While the mouth smoke inhaled contains PG at 300 parts per million, in the next breath the exhaled mist is invisible and PG is only about 5 ppm. Several PG users, however, might exhale enough to maintain a viricidal concentration of PG. PG is mostly absorbed, and broken down to carbon dioxide and pyruvate, which is burnt for energy. And so PG mainly benefits the user, not the surrounding air space.
Protecting air travelers
Air travel is a weak point in defending ourselves internationally from fatal respiratory infections. Bird flu and pandemic influenza can spread globally at the speed of jet travel, as one infected person can infect many others through air-conditioned, re-circulated air. Governments are spending millions on how to contain or just even slow the spread of such epidemics. Perhaps PG should be seriously considered.
Even the tuberculosis bacillus can infect passengers seated some distance from the infected passenger on a flight between San Francisco and Hawaii, as CDC (US Centers for Disease Control) has reported.
PG is not used to sterilise aircraft air, and airlines medicating cabin air via air-conditioners could incur unwanted legal claims. Permitting the use, however, of e-cigarettes on passenger flights might at least help protect the e-cigarette user, and just possibly, those in the adjacent seat. Airlines would not need to do a thing, apart from inform in-flight staff that e-cigarette use is permissible.
E-cigarettes, being flameless, and not producing harmful gases, are not banned by laws against second-hand smoke or use in flight. Their use in the aircraft toilet will not activate the smoke alarms. And until research confirms or denies it, the PG in e-cigarette mist just might have health protection benefits for other passengers. Non-smokers desiring enhanced personal protection could use e-cigarettes containing zero nicotine.
Further research
We already know there is no way e-cigarettes can cause lung cancer. Equally, they do not cause fires. E-users would also like to know whether switching to e-cigarettes reduces coughs, colds and flu compared with smokers who have simply quit nicotine altogether. Everyone would like to know whether permitting e-cigarette use on long haul flights reduces respiratory infection risk for passengers.
link til siden på nettet hvor det er klippet fra her
For mere info kig her: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/ ... por-4.html
|
|
What is the Electronic Cigarette?
The Electronic Cigarette is an electronic device, which imitates a regular cigarette.
It is a new way for users of regular tobacco based cigarettes to regulate and control their nicotine intake while in public places.
How does it work?
The Electronic Cigarette works in the following way: the user inhales on the electronic cigarette, this causes an air flow sensor to signal to the inbuilt microprocessor, that in turn activates the atomizer. The atomizer converts the liquid nicotine in the cartridge into a vapour (by atomization), which is digested by the user. Simultaneously, a water based vapour is released from the glycol by the atomizer to resemble 'smoke'. This 'smoke' has no risk to its user or persons around them.
What is in the Cartridge?
The base liquid of the cartridge is a mixture of liquid-nicotine, tobacco extract flavourings and Propylene glycol. The liquid contains no harmful chemicals, unlike a typical tobacco based cigarette.
What powers the device?
A rechargeable lithium battery powers the device.
In Summary
The Electronic Cigarette not only helps the user to regulate their nicotine intake, and creates a vapour resembling smoke, but it also looks like a cigarette; thereby helping the user with the psychological and physical habit of holding a regular cigarette.
The Electronic Cigarette has been awarded EC and RoHS certification as a safe electronic device.
Electronic Cigarette Cartridges Toxicology Report
We had our nicotine cartridges tested by a UK Independent Accredited Laboratory to ensure that they do not conatin any hazard substances apart from nicotine.
Nicotine is addictive, and is classed as a poison, and as regular cigarette smokers, you will be aware of this. In the conclusion of the report the Laboratory have said that on balance the nicotine cartridges appear to be a much safer alternative to the traditional cigarette, as they do not contain any of the known harmful chemicals that are in cigarettes. Please read the full report here .
The Electronic Cigarette, The Law and The User
The Law introduced in the United Kingdom in the Health Act 2006, banned the use of tobacco based cigarettes in public places.
The Act was introduced in response to where tobacco based cigarettes kills over 100,000 people each year in the UK, as lit tobacco produces tar, carcinogens, carbon monoxide and up to 400 other toxic substances.
In Chapter 28 that incorporates the Smoking ban, the definition of smoking is stated as : smoking refers to smoking tobacco or anything which contains tobacco, or smoking any other substance, and smoking includes being in possession of lit tobacco or of anything lit which contains tobacco, or being in possession of any other lit substance in a form in which it could be smoked.
The user of a electronic cigarette device is excluded from this Act as the device contains no tobacco ; it is not ignited, and produces no smoke from burning substances .
The electronic cigarette can be used in any location and within any premises that introduced a ban on tobacco based cigarettes with the introduction into Law of the Health Act 2006.
Propylene glycol
"Also known as propane-1,2-diol, it is an organic compound, usually a faint sweet, odourless, and colourless clear viscous(thick & sticky) liquid that is hygroscopic( absorbs water from the air) and miscible(capable of mixing with water) with water, acetone and chloroform." Wikepedia 09/08
Applications
Propylene glycol is used in the following ways:
- As a moisturiser in medicine, cosmetics, food, toothpaste, mouth wash and tobacco products.
- In electronic cigarettes to make the produced vapour better resemble cigarette smoke.
- As a medical and sexual lubricant.
- As an emulsifier (prevents separation) in Angostura and orange bitters.
- As a solvent for food colourings and flavourings.
- As a humectant (to keep product moist) food additive labelled E1520.
- As a carrier in fragrance oils.
- As a less toxic anti freeze (sounds scary, but it will be because of it's nature as an emulsifier).
- As a solvent used in photographic chemicals.
- In hand sanitizer lotions.
Please note this is not a full list, but is of the most common applications.
Safety
Propylene Glycol poisoning has apparently only occurred through inappropriate intravenous (straight into the vein) use, or accidental ingestion by children. However, you will need to ingest a lot of propylene glycol to cause harm. "Serious toxicity will occur only at extremely high intakes over a relatively short period of time" www.dow.com 09/08.
The U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has stated propylene glycol to be "generally recognised as safe." Wikepedia 09/08.
Propylene glycol shows no evidence of being a carcinogen or being genotoxic.
Propylene glycol can be irritating to some individuals.
The electronic cigarette is a new product, and as yet does not have a data base of clinical trials and evidence as to the long term effects on the smoker.
Nicotine
Nicotine is not a proven carcinogenic, but it is addictive, and in the right quantity is a known poison |
|
A germ-killing vapor Far from posing a threat to our health, the propylene glycol in e-smoking liquids might help keep us healthy. It would accomplish that by its germicidal action. It kills many of the major bacteria that threaten lung entry into our bodies.
Until yesterday, I was unfamiliar with this potentially beneficial consequence of propylene glycol vapor.
Back in the late '30s, researchers at the University of Chicago stumbled onto its effectiveness as a germ-killer, as related in this Time magazine story from Nov. 16, 1942:
"A powerful preventive against pneumonia, influenza and other respiratory diseases may be promised by a brilliant series of experiments conducted during the last three years at the University of Chicago's Billings Hospital. Dr. Oswald Hope Robertson last week was making final tests with a new germicidal vapor - propylene glycol - to sterilize air. If the results so far obtained are confirmed, one of the age-old searches of man will finally achieve its goal...
"...the researchers found that the propylene glycol itself was a potent germicide. One part of glycol in 2,000,000 parts of air would - within a few seconds - kill concentrations of air-suspended pneumococci, streptococci and other bacteria numbering millions to the cubic foot.
"How did it work? Respiratory disease bacteria float about in tiny droplets of water breathed, sneezed and coughed from human beings. The germicidal glycol also floats in infinitesimally small particles. Calculations showed that if droplet had to hit droplet, it would take two to 200 hours for sterilization of sprayed air to take place. Since sterilization took place in seconds, Dr. Robertson concluded that the glycol droplets must give off gas molecules which dissolve in the water droplets and kill the germs within them.
"Dr. Robertson placed groups of mice in a chamber and sprayed its air first with propylene glycol, then with influenza virus. All the mice lived. Then he sprayed the chamber with virus alone. All the mice died."
The complete Time story can be read here: Air Germicide - TIME
In a scientific summary of the discovery, it was noted that "Tests on possible deleterious effects of breathing propylene glycol containing atmospheres over long periods of time are being carried out."
Those tests were done and a second summary report on propylene glycol vapor was released:
"Propylene glycol is harmless to man when swallowed or injected into the veins. It is also harmless to mice who have breathed it for long periods. But medical science is cautious - there was still a remote chance that glycol might accumulate harmfully in the erect human lungs which, unlike those of mice, do not drain themselves. So last June Dr. Robertson began studying the effect of glycol vapor on monkeys imported from the University of Puerto Rico's School of Tropical Medicine. So far, after many months' exposure to the vapor, the monkeys are happy and fatter than ever. Dr. Robertson does not expect mankind to live, like his monkeys, continuously in an atmosphere of glycol vapor; but it should be most valuable in such crowded places as schools and theaters, where most respiratory diseases are picked up."
The monkeys lived in enclosures filled with propylene glycol vapor. No deleterious effect was ever reported. And the concentrations of PG we inhale on a regular basis surely must equal the amount inhaled by the monkeys for this test. Obviously, no scientist saw a time when a device would atomize a PG mist that would then be inhaled for fun. But time and technology has given us the electronic cigarette. With each inhalation, we are washing our lungs with a germicidal agent used today in some "air sanitizers".
Glycerine, by the way, has some germicidal impact, but not, apparently, to the degree provided by inhaling propylene glycol vapor. Glycerine is now used by dairy farmers to help prevent bacteria entering a cow's teats after milking. Glycerine both softens the teats and kills bacteria.
One more quote on PG: "The vapour from as little as 0.5 mg of propylene glycol can kill nearly all the microorganisms in a liter of heavily contaminated air within 15 seconds."
The initial experiments with PG vapor were part of a search to find ways to create clean rooms, so the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic that killed so many millions would never be repeated. Today, researchers have wondered online if propylene glycol vapor might not offer protection against a widely feared coming pandemic of bird flu, tagged H5N1.
Imagine e-smokers being healthier than non-smokers in such a scenario |
Uddrag af medicinalsk test fra Health institut of NewZealand
Summary
The Cigarette is designed to be a safe alternative to smoking, and on examination from a number of aspects, appears to achieve this aim. Its sophisticated electronics vapourizes, separately for each puff, very small quantities of nicotine dissolved in propylene glycol, two small well- known molecules with excellent safety profiles, – into a fine aerosol. Each puff contains one third to half the nicotine in a tobacco cigarette’s puff. The cartridge liquid is tobacco-free and no combustion occurs.
Once on sale, its on-going safety profile depends on 1) good manufacturing practice and pharmaceutical-grade purity of the nicotine and propylene glycol used in the cartridge liquid. 2) the prevention of shared use which could result in cross infection.
In early 2008, Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Auckland is testing the e-cigarette’s efficacy in raising blood nicotine levels and in reducing cigarette cravings.
Læs hele reporten her .pdf
Klik her for original artiklen |
|
For at læse om bivirkningerne ved
e-rygning klik nedenfor
|
|
|
Julefrokost omtale Se link her
|
| Læs hvad pressen skrev Politikken 12-6-08 Rygeloven har gjort rygerne til et forvist folkefærd, men nu baner teknologi og gråzoner i lovgivningen vejen for rygere.
Flere steder begynder elektriske cigaretter - såkaldte »e-cigaretter« - at vinde frem, erfarer Børsen FødevareSundhed.
»Cigaretterne« er fuldt lovlige at »ryge« på barer og cafeer, da rygeloven i sin formulering ikke griber fat om de elektriske cigaretter.
|
| Læs hvad pressen skrev Politikken 12-6-08 Rygeloven har gjort rygerne til et forvist folkefærd, men nu baner teknologi og gråzoner i lovgivningen vejen for rygere.
Flere steder begynder elektriske cigaretter - såkaldte » NewCigaret.com « - at vinde frem, erfarer Børsen FødevareSundhed.
»Cigaretterne« er fuldt lovlige at »ryge« på barer og cafeer, da rygeloven i sin formulering ikke griber fat om de elektriske cigaretter.
Kræftens Bekæmpelse advarer
»Produktet må siges at befinde sig i en form for gråzone. Hvis man alene kigger på rygeloven kan produktet lovligt anvendes på bl.a. barer, fordi det ikke er en tobaksvare, og fordi der ikke finder en forbrænding sted, der gør, at rygeren generer og udsætter omgivelserne for passiv rygning,« sige, advokat .
Overlæge i Kræftens Bekæmpelse, Inge Haunstrup Clemmensen, advarer kraftigt mod elektriske cigaretter, som hun mener specielt vil forføre unge mennesker til nikotinafhængighed.
Ligner en accessorie
»Kræftens Bekæmpelse er kede af, at man opfinder noget, der ligner en cigaret, til rygeafvænning, fordi man så nemt kan lokke unge til, da det er en nemmere måde at ryge på. En elektrisk cigaret indebærer f.eks. ikke, at det kradser i halsen,« siger hun.
Inge Haunsrup Clemmensen siger til Børsen FødevareSundhed, at hun heller ikke er begejstret for, at e-cigaretten ligner en accessorie i sig selv.
Den kan f.eks. fås i forskellige farver, og der skal ikke megen opfindsomhed til for at tænke cigaretten ud i endnu flere varianter og farvekombinationer.
Et dårligt alternativ til rygeafvænning
»At den opfattes som en accessorie vil i allerhøjeste grad lokke mange unge til at begynde at ryge,« siger Inge Haunstrup Clemmensen, der heller ikke giver meget for, at e-cigaretten markedsføres ved, at selve indåndings- og udåndingsdampen er uskadelig for rygeren som de passive rygere.
»Det vil altid være sundhedsskadeligt at suge nikotin ned i lungerne eller sende det ud i et lokale, hvor der er andre. Den elektriske cigaret er et meget dårligere alternativ til rygeafvænning end et plaster,« siger Inge Haunstrup Clemmensen til Børsen FødevareSundhed.
Kan handles lovligt som livsstilsprodukt
Lægemiddelstyrelsen er ved at tage stilling til, om e-cigaretterne hører ind under kategorien lægemiddel.
»Det er ikke rimeligt, at produktet skal godkendes som et lægemiddel, for vi ønsker ikke at markedsføre e-cigaretten som et produkt, der skal få folk til at stoppe med at ryge. Vi synes, det er mere retvisende at kalde det et livsstilsprodukt,« siger C. Bryld, d, der bl.a. sælger cigaretten via internettet.
Han henviser til, at myndighederne i andre EU lande har sagt god for produktet og givet tilladelser, der betyder, at e-cigaretterne kan handles legalt i EU på nettet som et livstilsprodukt
|
Wanna keep the cancer stick away? China's has introduced the first ever electronic cigarette to help you kick the smoking habit! This e-cigarette is really just a battery-powered nicotine inhaler that looks like a cancer smoke stick. The e-cigarette device delivers nicotine during inhales to simulate the smoking experience. With this amazing electronic cigarette, you look like a standard smoker (style) who enjoys his "real" cigarette.The steel cigarette also emits light and vapor like a real cigarette but it allows smokers to slowing reduce the level of nicotine and eventually quit the habit. The company said the "steel-cigarette" works better than the patch or nicotine gum because the device still allows the smoking experience.
The steel-cigarette already available in China and some European countries for about $200 but not yet available in US. |
Udtalt af medicinal direktør om sit produkt Nikotin tyggegummi
"Men jeg må understrege, at cigaretter indeholder 3.000 skadelige stoffer, mens vores præparater indeholder nikotin, som nok er vanedannende, men ikke farligt i sig selv " |
Se hvad Nikotin tyggegummi indeholder;
Nicotinell ® Classic, tyggegummi a 2 mg (overtrukne) eller 4 mg (overtrukne) nicotin. Tilsat smagskorrigenser: glycerol, levomenthol, maltitol, mannitol, sorbitol, tuttifrutti-aroma og xylitol samt farve: Titandioxid E171 (tyggegummi 2 mg og 4 mg), se mere her
http://www.medicin.dk/(gwwklt55cvnesmun23m1xw45)/show.aspx |
Referencer
616. Silagy C, Lancaster T, Stead L et al. Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; (3): CD000146.
|
Nikotintyggegummi er ufarligt, men afhængighedsskabende. Du skal lige som med tobak forberede dig godt og ligge det på hylden evt. efter udtrapning.
|
The bluff puff, but it's not the full quit
- Cameron Houston
- June 2, 2008
HEALTH organisations have blasted the new electronic cigarettes and cigars being promoted as a way to beat the bans in pubs, offices and public transport.
The battery-powered E-cigarett is touted as a "healthy alternative to smoking" and delivers nicotine through an atomiser that creates puffs of vapour that resembles cigarette smoke.
"You can still have the sensation of smoke but you are not inhaling all the toxic chemicals associated with tobacco," said Albert Nisman, who has distribution rights for the controversial device in Australia. "There is no harm to others around you, as it is smoke free, and with the proposed new laws banning smoking in a car with children this product will definitely be a benefit."
The device, sold overseas as www.NewCigaret.com , is not intended as nicotine replacement therapy, according to a company website, despite claims that it was "much more effective" than any other quit product.
Quit executive director Fiona Sharkie said the product was a gimmick that deliberately flouted the spirit of tobacco bans.
"One of the many benefits of a ban on smoking in bars in clubs is that it encourages people to quit smoking or smoke less," she said. "This product is clearly marketed in a way to get around these bans.
"We doubt that such an awkward, novelty-style device would be popular in Australia."
VicHealth chief executive Todd Harper said health claims regarding the product were dubious. "To suggest this is a legitimate way to give up smoking is ridiculous and possibly dangerous," he said. "The packing of the product to resemble a cigarette blatantly extends the association."
Last year, the tobacco giant Philip Morris launched a similar electronic device. It claimed the hand-held device would usher in a "new movement in smoking, where art meets technology", but it failed to make an impact on younger smokers.
It also falls down because it heats specially designed cigarettes that emit some smoke.
................................................................................................................................................................
Kommentar til denne artikkel i forum
Here we have "health authorities" telling us e-smoking is no better than smoking really. What they want is for all of us to quit. Quit pretending, too. When they look over a park now, they want to see every bench occupied by healthy people not embracing cigarettes! But .. wait .. there's someone there with a white thing in his hand that LOOKS like a cigarette .. and he's puffing on it .. and smoky stuff is coming from his mouth and nose.
The health fanatics that successfully brought us all the present smoking bans are not going to accept that person with the fake cigarette that puffs. You know they won't. They want tobacco use banned and smoking relegated to history. E-smoking looks like smoking to them. And that's enough to raise their anger. You can't reason with anger about this being healthier, etc. They won't even listen.
It's only just starting .... |
|
|
Personer der ikke skulle bruge vores NyCigaret :
are not suitable for following persons:
- Children and persons under 18.
- Non-smoker.
- Persons who are allergically sensitive or react to nicotine.
- Persons with hypertensions problems.
- Pregnant women or women who give udder feeding.
- Persons with hearts and dishes sicknesses
Persons who are under treatment of a doctor or (chronic) a sickness have, recommend we first discussing with their treating doctor
|
